News for April 2010

this week on the interwebs.

This week on the interwebs was full of Apple and Flash. But we had a little Facebook privacy gem pop up as well. 

Steve Jobs writes a letter about Flash.
http://www.apple.com/hotnews/thoughts-on-flash/

Adobe responds on WSJ site, flash video stalls while I watch it.
http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2010/04/29/live-blogging-the-journals-interview-with-adobe-ceo/?mod=wsj_share_digg 

Apple sends the cops after Jason Chen of Gizmodo after drunk employee leaves iPhone 4g in a bar.
http://gizmodo.com/5524843/police-seize-jason-chens-computers 

Kates party on Facebook goes wild. 60,000 confirmed guests. Yay Privacy!
http://www.geekosystem.com/kates-party-facebook-meme/

Hugo the “Devil” joins twitter plans to take on Ashton.
http://techcrunch.com/2010/04/29/hugo-chavez-twitter/

 

Posted via web from mr.brain

Posted: April 30th, 2010
Categories: Uncategorized
Tags:
Comments: No Comments.

social media roi, yes it’s possible?

So on Thursday I took in the AMA special Interest group “Social Media ROI, yes it’s possible” (#SMROI for the hashtaggers). The event was held at the Spoke Club on King West, and was billed as the event to teach all us social media evangelists how to sell it to our superiors through proving the ROI. Here’s the full description form the AMA Event page:

You are a social media evangelist, interested in leading your company into a new age of marketing. Your boss is willing to go along; provided you can tell him the payback on your investment. Measuring ROI on social media is one of the most challenging issues facing marketers today. Come listen to three industry leaders give their perspective on how social media can and should be measured. You’ll come away from this session armed with how social media can be used to drive your organizations bottom line.

Wow, three industry experts are going to share with 70+ social media evangelist their methodologies on measuring ROI. This sounds great. I started to think to wonder which metrics they track, and tools they use. Do their clients allow them access to business data to actually measure the impact on business results? Or is this going to be another lunchbag letdown?

Well what we got from this event was more fluff and more stats about how big social media is. WOW!  If this room is supposed to be filled with evangelists they were preaching to the choir. We all should know by now that social media is huge, that it’s not a fad, and it’s very much gone mobile. ok, got it, good. Now tell us through actual actionable items how we can successfully measure ROI and measure against business results.

No slight against the speakers they all presented their content well and their was a lot of useful information but it was very high level. I also understand they were all given 15 – 20 minutes so how deep can you really get. So really my beef is not at all with the speakers but more with the event itself.  Maybe the AMA just billed this wrong or I misunderstood it. I actually thought maybe I missed something and was way off. So I went back a searched through the #SMROI tagged tweets and grabbed the presentations available to see if I truly missed something. Based on my self doubt fueled research I am no longer in doubt.

Steve Irvine form 80/20 Solutions did the best job at directing us even remotely close to understanding any form of measuring ROI. His individual approach is interesting and the Tupperware analogy was great, If your orginiazation employs any type of call center some ideas in his presentation may spark your interest.  you can grab his presentation here.

Check out the tweet stream: #SMROI

Another attendees take on the event: SMOJoe.com

I’m sure these events will only get better. Just a little disappointed I guess.

-Adam

Posted via web from mr.brain

Posted: April 30th, 2010
Categories: Uncategorized
Tags:
Comments: No Comments.

the interwebs invade TV.

As I sit back and stream some of my favourite TV. programs from the comfort of my bed. I’ve been noticing an interesting trend. Technologies from the interwebs are making their way to TV. and they’re doing it in some interesting ways, well sort of. 

Let’s start with simple script integrations. Whether you’ll admit it or not you most likely watch Gossip Girl and if you’re anything like me you have a strange unexplainable man crush on Chuck Bass. Admissions aside you know the show has always had interwebs integration like their blogger / narrator namesake. However in recent episodes they’ve been using an interesting line, “Bing it”.  It seems the marketing folks over at Microsoft are trying to change the colloquial vernacular of interweb searches  from “Google it” to “Bing it”. All I can say is good luck. I think it will take much more than the fictional upper east siders of Gossip Girl to accomplish this vocabulary switch.

The more interesting example is the Twitter integration of ShowTime’s “Nurse Jackie”. If you don’t watch this show, do it. The show has cleverly integrated twitter into the script and the neurotic ticks of one the shows main characters Dr. Fitch Cooper. The show has successfully created online engagement by having  Dr. Cooper tweet during the show, the in show tweets are tweeted out in real time to the @DoctorCoop Twitter account. Not only do his tweets that happen on camera go live, he tweets between on camera appearances creating another level of engagement for fans during the episode. @DrCoop regularly responds to comments and ReTweets of his tweets. For me this type of engagement is genius. It allows fans to connect with a character on an entirely new level.

Robert Hayes, Showtime’s senior vice president and general manager for digital media explained; "We want the story to extend beyond the half-hour or hour that it lives on air and become ubiquitous with your life."

I believe we can safely say mission accomplished. After just one episode of @DoctorCoop tweeting he amassed over 8000 followers and now sits at 11,538 followers.

Good work ShowTime.

-Adam

Posted via email from mr.brain

Posted: April 16th, 2010
Categories: Uncategorized
Tags:
Comments: No Comments.